I decided to use the social bookmarking tool Diigo. Diigo is knowledge management systems that help users manage their information. It helps streamline the overload of information and to improve productivity. But the main benefit to using Diigo is that it’s easy for people to use. (“About Diigo”, 2013., para. 1-11).
Diigo allows users to
highlight text. As users read through online articles, books etc. they can
highlight sections of text and these parts will remain when the user returns to
the article. Diigo lets users make annotations about text. This is done using a
tool called sticky notes and works the same as regular stick notes. Diigo
allows users to share information. This lets people to collaborate on project
easily. When using Diigo any links are saved to your personal archive this
means that broken or missing links are no longer an issue. These Diigo features
are all forms of tagging. Tagging is assigning descriptive words to articles or
text so they can be organised personally. This “enables users to organize their
bookmarks in a meaningful way and search for resources associated to specific
tags” (Del Moral, Estelles & Gonzalez, 2010, para. 11).
Kroski (2008, p. 53) demonstrates how using a social
bookmarking tool like Diigo or Delicious allows users to access their bookmarked
articles from any computer, not just the computer they used when they
bookmarked the article. This is possible as the bookmarked articles are saved
to an online archive not a physical computer.
After using Diigo I have found that bookmarking and tagging
is extremely useful. Academic libraries should encourage students to use social
bookmarking and offer tutorials at the university library about how to use Diigo
or Delicious. Tagging can be used in all libraries by adding the option to the
OPAC. This will allow library patrons to organise material by their own
criteria.
References
Del Moral, Esther., Estelles, Enrique., & Gonzalez,
Fernando. (2010). Social bookmarking tools as facilitators of learning and
research collaborative processes: The Diigo case. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 6,
175.
Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/ps/i.do?action=interpret&id=GALE%7CA247740282&v=2.1&u=csu_au&it=r&p=EAIM&sw=w&authCount=1
Kroski, Ellyssa. (2008). Web
2.0 for librarians and information professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman
Publishers, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment